GenAI sounds smart but in regulated domains like mortgage lending, that illusion can be dangerous.
GenAI Hype Meets Financial Reality
From chatbots to underwriting assistants, Generative AI (GenAI) systems like ChatGPT are making their way into nearly every corner of the financial services industry. In theory, these tools offer enormous promise. They’re fast, always available, and increasingly fluent in the language of business, law, and finance.
But beneath their polished responses lies a fundamental truth: GenAI tools don’t actually understand what they’re saying. They generate text based on statistical patterns, not comprehension. And in high-stakes, regulated environments like home lending, that distinction isn’t academic, it’s existential.
Why GenAI Can’t Actually “Think”
At the core, large language models (LLMs) are intelligent pattern-matching engines. They predict the next most likely word or phrase based on an input prompt and training data. While this can mimic intelligence in conversation, it’s not reasoning. It’s more like language auto-completion on steroids.
Of course, the inability to actually understand and reason as humans do creates serious performance limitations for GenAI-based systems. We highlight two examples of performance limitations in this blog, like miscalculating Debt-to-Income (DTI) and hallucinated regulatory guidance. Stay tuned.
Here are some key limitations:
- No True Comprehension: GenAI doesn’t understand what a “mortgage” or “escrow” actually is. It only knows how those words typically appear in text.
- No Goals, No Agency: It doesn’t care if it’s right. It doesn’t “know” if it’s wrong. It simply outputs what seems most statistically plausible.
- No Internal Logic or Awareness: GenAI doesn’t flag when it’s guessing, nor does it verify its output against facts or structured rules.
- No Initiative in Reasoning: It won’t break a problem into logical steps unless prompted – and even then, it might hallucinate or skip essential parts.
These systems are not truth engines. They’re linguistic mirrors, reflecting back patterns from their training corpus. These patterns may or may not be accurate or relevant in a given context.
When Good Language Becomes Bad Advice
Let’s move from theory to reality. Here are two real-world examples where the illusion of intelligence leads to actual risk:
Example 1: Miscalculating Debt-to-Income (DTI)
Imagine a GenAI assistant is deployed to help loan officers answer underwriting questions. A user asks:
“Borrower has $8,000/month gross income, $400 student loan, $300 car payment, $200 in credit card minimums, and a proposed mortgage payment of $2,500. What’s the back-end DTI?”
And GenAI responds:
“Back-end DTI is calculated by dividing the mortgage payment by income. So, 2500 / 8000 = 31.25%.”
This is wrong. That’s the front-end DTI formula. Back-end DTI includes all monthly debts. The correct calculation is:
Total debts: $2,500 + $400 + $300 + $200 = $3,400
Back-end DTI = 3400 / 8000 = 42.5%
A difference like that can mean approving a noncompliant loan – possibly violating Fannie Mae’s 45% cap.
Example 2: Hallucinated Regulatory Guidance
In another case, a compliance officer asks a GenAI-powered assistant:
“Can a lender deny a loan if the applicant is on maternity leave?”
And the GenAI answer:
“According to CFPB Regulation M, lenders may consider maternity leave income unreliable and deny the application.”
There’s a major problem: Regulation M doesn’t exist in this context. Worse, federal fair lending laws (ECOA and Regulation B) prohibit discrimination based on parental status.
This isn’t a simple typo, it’s a fabricated regulation. And if that misinformation informs policy, it could lead to illegal lending practices.
These Errors Aren’t Bugs – They’re Design Features
Critically, these mistakes aren’t fixable with “more training data” or “next year’s model.” They stem from how GenAI works:
- No structured knowledge of lending rules.
- No ability to assess legal relevance.
- No sense of uncertainty or caution.
- No verification loop.
In other words, GenAI is not a compliance-grade tool. Treating it as such is a recipe for regulatory exposure, reputational damage, and real financial harm.
Don’t Let Fluency Fool You
GenAI sounds smart but sounding smart is not the same as being right. And in FinTech, especially mortgage lending, correctness matters. It determines who qualifies for a loan, what disclosures are triggered, and whether your business stays within the bounds of federal law.
To safely unlock the value of GenAI, we must stop pretending it’s a rational decision-maker. Instead, we must treat it as a very capable AI-powered assistant with no reasoning, no self-awareness, and no accountability.
Join the Conversation!
Subscribe to our biweekly newsletter for a deep dive into where AI technology is going for mortgage lenders, specific use cases, and discuss a “smarter, not harder” approach to innovation.
